<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://skinnerlayne.sys-con.com"  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>Latest News from Skinner Layne</title>
 <link>http://skinnerlayne.sys-con.com/</link>
 <description>Latest News from Skinner Layne</description>
 <language>en</language>
 <copyright>Copyright 2009 Ulitzer.com</copyright>
 <generator>Ulitzer.com</generator>
 <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 22:28:43 EST</lastBuildDate>
 <docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
 <ttl>360</ttl>
<item>
 <title>The Post-Modern Rhetoric of High Technology</title>
 <link>http://skinnerlayne.sys-con.com/node/287755</link>
 <description>People across the globe are publishing countless articles and books to try to define Web 2.0, but like its underpinning philosophy, it is not easily defined. In fact, to put it into a box would be to contradict its very nature. Web 2.0 can take two distinct directions, and it is perhaps the rhetoric of it all that will define the path. Web 2.0 can be the French Revolution of Technology or it can be the American Revolution of Technology.&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://skinnerlayne.sys-con.com/node/287755&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Tue, 20 Jun 2006 10:15:00 EDT</pubDate>
 <guid isPermaLink="true">http://skinnerlayne.sys-con.com/node/287755</guid>
 <comments>http://skinnerlayne.sys-con.com/node/287755#feedback</comments>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
